PDA

View Full Version : fox body can out roll race a supra ?



AutoMods
09-24-2012, 08:46 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOAIW14Sguk&feature=player_embedded#!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOAIW14Sguk&feature=player_embedded#!

oVa-Boost
09-24-2012, 10:12 PM
damn makes me wanna get a ford and stuff it with chevy stuff

snickerlicker
09-25-2012, 06:18 AM
damn makes me wanna get a ford and stuff it with chevy stuff

Why would you do that? It is faster with the Ford stuff still in it...

Scott
09-25-2012, 07:13 AM
LOL at the title of this thread!! Like its surprising..? You been under a rock for 33 years or what

Drifte
09-25-2012, 07:45 AM
We saw that guy at TX2k12 with the mustang IM pretty sure. Jonvon was there too but his bikes broke. If its the stang from texas its crazy fast.

snickerlicker
09-25-2012, 08:28 AM
LOL at the title of this thread!! Like its surprising..? You been under a rock for 33 years or what

None of them realize Mustangs were fast LONG before the so called all mighty LS engine came out in 97...

FiFdYnUtZ
09-25-2012, 09:07 AM
Yeah there were never any fast conventional sbc cars...LOL

AutoMods
09-25-2012, 09:30 AM
LOL at the title of this thread!! Like its surprising..? You been under a rock for 33 years or what

its rare cuz supras are waaaay more aerodynamic bro . if you would've hung out with tuner crowd since 2001 like me, you would know that.

snickerlicker
09-25-2012, 09:31 AM
Yeah there were never any fast conventional sbc cars...LOL

Yeah those tuned port injection cars were straight up street killers....LMFAO!

FiFdYnUtZ
09-25-2012, 10:00 AM
Just about as effective as the sn95 cars with the 4.6

Scott
09-25-2012, 10:16 AM
Im saying wtf to the "foxbody can roll race a supra" comment.. IMO at this level engines are engines there is no magic in ANY of them! but for the sake of argument... I hate LS engines too

Scott
09-25-2012, 10:18 AM
its rare cuz supras are waaaay more aerodynamic bro . if you would've hung out with tuner crowd since 2001 like me, you would know that.

Doesnt sound like your serious here so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just assume you are not.

slo4cyl
09-25-2012, 11:05 AM
Doesnt sound like your serious here so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just assume you are not.

ryan is a ricer at heart :)

K-ville
09-25-2012, 02:26 PM
Just about as effective as the sn95 cars with the 4.6

Theres a guy running outlaw 10.5 who like like 2000 hp and won a few races with a 4.6

sparkles
09-25-2012, 03:46 PM
863

K-ville
09-25-2012, 05:21 PM
I cant even be mad thats funny

Jappbox
09-25-2012, 06:23 PM
Did anyone miss that? .... Supra on 24lbs... That is low, C16 and 35lbs is were it should be. its not making 1000whp on 24lbs. 20lbs of boost on a 88mm 383 is a good amount but 24lbs though a 3.0L aint shit. Funny how videos get so miss leading its not even funny. There was a huge thread on how people see and veiw videos and dont know anything that really happend (traction, weather,race gas, pump gas, low boost, driver error) Obviously the person that made the video was the Mustang owne/Fan boy. At Least he told the truth in the video on the low boost supra setting.

K-ville
09-25-2012, 06:33 PM
Did anyone miss that? .... Supra on 24lbs... That is low, C16 and 35lbs is were it should be. its not making 1000whp on 24lbs. 20lbs of boost on a 88mm 383 is a good amount but 24lbs though a 3.0L aint shit. Funny how videos get so miss leading its not even funny. There was a huge thread on how peo
ple see and veiw videos and dont know anything that really happend (traction, weather,race gas, pump gas, low boost, driver error) Obviously the person that made the video was the Mustang owne/Fan boy. At Least he told the truth in the video on the low boost supra setting.

So hes obviously mustang fanboy... Like your a supra fanboy... Haha who cares dude its a entertaining video to watch nothin more to it haha i can honestly say im a hardcore stang guy but id kill for a supra.

Jappbox
09-25-2012, 06:42 PM
Im trying not to be anyones fanboy here i dont know the 2 cars honestly and i love anything with a turbo on it, i was just stating the obvious here. It was a good race but we all know autos dont mph like stick cars, supras have one of the best gearing out their maybe thats the boost setting they agreed on and im sure the mustang runs better 1/4 times but will not take down a well done 80mm supra on the highway (160+ trap speeds) even my built viper wont take a well built one down not unless i made over 1100 and i would need race gas for that

Jappbox
09-25-2012, 06:46 PM
Unfortunetly nothing can beat a ugr race version lambo on the highway no bikes or anything sad day when there is some far gap from those cars its going to ruin the "fun"

c_mart_28
09-25-2012, 07:22 PM
Speaking of your car Jesse, any updates?

Jappbox
09-25-2012, 07:25 PM
Had to send aem out boost pulse stoped working, its done and im over nighting it back to try and head to dyno in norwalk saturday

AutoMods
09-25-2012, 08:00 PM
ford's have tons of gear choices too 3.08 / 3.27 / 3.55 / 3.73 / 4.10 / 4.30 / 4.56 / 4.88 / 5.13 . and they are cheap which is why i have a ford rear in my car now .

my rx7 only had 4.10 or the 3.90, but the 3.90 uses a weaker pinion . i'm surprised nobody would step up and invest in making different gears for the rx7, I seen a few vendors look into it and decided not too after seeing the cost to develop gear sets.

sparkles
09-25-2012, 08:10 PM
Probably because they don't make enough torque to matter?

c_mart_28
09-25-2012, 08:13 PM
Headed to the dyno on Saturday, huh?

What time?

AutoMods
09-25-2012, 08:15 PM
Probably because they don't make enough torque to matter?

the rotaries also rev really high so they can get through the traps pretty well by pushing the rpms.

sparkles
09-25-2012, 08:59 PM
That has to do with gears because....?

sparkles
09-25-2012, 09:00 PM
I also heard Nissan is very superb vehicle and maintenance cost is high.

AutoMods
09-25-2012, 09:47 PM
That has to do with gears because....?

if your car is banging off the rev limiter through the traps, you need a higher gear. rotaries can rev really high, hence they don't have problems getting through the traps in 4th gear even with their low 4.10 gear . so a lot of them don't need to buy gears. now with my v8 in the same car, I was at 7k redline @136mph, no choice but to buy a higher gear. If I had 9k redline like a rotary I would be able to trap 175, same gear.

http://tendereldercare.com/wp-content/uploads/spoon-feeding.jpg

Sleepy
09-26-2012, 06:51 AM
Headed to the dyno on Saturday, huh?

What time?

Mini meet?
Assuming Jesse wants the company.

Scott
09-26-2012, 07:21 AM
if your car is banging off the rev limiter through the traps, you need a higher gear. rotaries can rev really high, hence they don't have problems getting through the traps in 4th gear even with their low 4.10 gear . so a lot of them don't need to buy gears. now with my v8 in the same car, I was at 7k redline @136mph, no choice but to buy a higher gear. If I had 9k redline like a rotary I would be able to trap 175, same gear.

http://tendereldercare.com/wp-content/uploads/spoon-feeding.jpg

Not sure I agree with that 100%, my car ran faster "better ET" banging off the limiter with 4.10's than powering thru with 3.73's... Just sayin

and I find it hard to believe that a UGR lambo will beat anything on the road from a roll, theres alot of turbo bikes out there that will put out over 400 HP and I would expect one of those to slaughter about anything.. Im sure there will be some video posted of a roll race here soon of UGR lambo and a turbo busa to prove me wrong though, I just find it hard to believe a bike that can trap 190-200 cant compete with a car on a hwy roll

Drifte
09-26-2012, 07:28 AM
Im sure some can, I havent seen it done though. That high hp in a busa they require a lot of up keep. I have seen a built 1000rr do a decent job of keeping up, and those arent busa aerodynamic and I think he was at 220hp.

AutoMods
09-26-2012, 08:57 AM
Doesnt sound like your serious here so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just assume you are not.

yea i'm just joking around with the title and such


Not sure I agree with that 100%, my car ran faster "better ET" banging off the limiter with 4.10's than powering thru with 3.73's... Just sayin

yea that happens.

my scenerio was different. I didn't want to be at 7,000+ rpms on a non-built ls1 that I was already pushing decent horsepower. And this year trap speed should be higher so I really had to either get a higher gear or shift into 5th gear. but really i was just giving sparkles an example of why the redline can relate to gearing.

K-ville
09-26-2012, 10:57 AM
Im sure some can, I havent seen it done though. That high hp in a busa they require a lot of up keep. I have seen a built 1000rr do a decent job of keeping up, and thse arent busa aerodynamic and I think he was at 220hp.

How do you think a busa isnt aero?

slo4cyl
09-26-2012, 12:54 PM
How do you think a busa isnt aero?

I think he was sayin the 1000rr's aren't as aerodynamic as busa's

slow ride
09-26-2012, 01:34 PM
And at higher triple digit speeds the bikes tend to fall off even if they have crazy power. I just want a fun car "relatively" on the cheap side :)

Jappbox
09-26-2012, 02:00 PM
Im not sure of the Dyno time, Clinton Said im good to go if my ECU comes in, once i have it in my hands ill make the call, thinking some time around 12-1pm?? it will be saturday and a good 2 hours for me, im trailing it, just in case... Im shooting for high numbers on 93 octane.

slow ride
09-26-2012, 02:32 PM
Where do you get 93? Only places up here are Jim Lind which is Shell V power 93 no ethanol and Walmart/Murphy 93 which is e10.

Jappbox
09-26-2012, 04:05 PM
I use Shell V-power, it has Ethanal but after lots of research the E10 in it is fine, infact higher octane then regular 93 (like how e85 is 110ish) The only down side I found of E10 93 is a little less gas milage, from the Ethanal, thats all. and its a few blocks from my house. Now when I move ill be a few blocks from E85 but by then im sure it will be only E70 year round.

Jappbox
09-26-2012, 04:10 PM
Not sure I agree with that 100%, my car ran faster "better ET" banging off the limiter with 4.10's than powering thru with 3.73's... Just sayin

and I find it hard to believe that a UGR lambo will beat anything on the road from a roll, theres alot of turbo bikes out there that will put out over 400 HP and I would expect one of those to slaughter about anything.. Im sure there will be some video posted of a roll race here soon of UGR lambo and a turbo busa to prove me wrong though, I just find it hard to believe a bike that can trap 190-200 cant compete with a car on a hwy roll

You mean a 449whp busa? like this race: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuNX0JQAGZM

Now thats Tims UGR stage 3 Stick G, The new "stage 1 R" Versions make this car look slow. Make over 1600whp are Paddle shift, and are Superlageras makeing them 400lbs lighter. Trust me nothing has beaten a "R" version, Infact UGR says if something beats the R version they will race them with the brand new Stage 2 R-Version making 1900whp.

Here is jamies car, he has a call out for anyone that thinks they can beat his car on the highway. noone has won yet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sxulbub6QY

K-ville
09-26-2012, 05:16 PM
Ive ridden 400hp busas and i cant even imagine a car outrunning one!

snickerlicker
09-26-2012, 07:12 PM
8 sec TT Lamborghini;

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Kb2CBRxnTyc&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Ffeature%3Dplayer_embedded%2 6v%3DKb2CBRxnTyc

TbTalon94
09-26-2012, 07:21 PM
Not gonna lie that Heffner kit looks way better then UGR's

Domestic Disturbance
09-26-2012, 11:22 PM
Whats the deal with choosing the Gallardo? Are those v10's just incredibly strong from the get go? Reason I ask is because stock for stock there's many comparable or even better exotics to choose from. Not hating though, I love lambo's and those v10's sound so good!

snickerlicker
09-27-2012, 06:01 AM
Whats the deal with choosing the Gallardo? Are those v10's just incredibly strong from the get go? Reason I ask is because stock for stock there's many comparable or even better exotics to choose from. Not hating though, I love lambo's and those v10's sound so good!

I'm guessing its the AWD.

slow ride
09-27-2012, 06:53 AM
AWD, quick shifting, decent displacement, high redline, light weight, etc. I'm sure the high redline helps make a wide powerband up top when most engines would need to shift. At this level all the pushrod guys would need to be solid roller to increase RPM to make more peak power and less torque which tends to distroy drivetrain parts. It's still amazing that the Lambo's drivetrain can withstand punishment at this level.

I've never looked into what is all done to the engines/drivetrains to keep up at this level. I'd think the blocks would be sleeved stock aluminum block or one off billet. Never been in my price range otherwise I'd know ;)

Scott
09-27-2012, 08:29 AM
You mean a 449whp busa? like this race: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NuNX0JQAGZM

Now thats Tims UGR stage 3 Stick G, The new "stage 1 R" Versions make this car look slow. Make over 1600whp are Paddle shift, and are Superlageras makeing them 400lbs lighter. Trust me nothing has beaten a "R" version, Infact UGR says if something beats the R version they will race them with the brand new Stage 2 R-Version making 1900whp.

Here is jamies car, he has a call out for anyone that thinks they can beat his car on the highway. noone has won yet.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sxulbub6QY

I know these things are badass but I just dont buy into this magic car thing.. 1900whp are you serious? I would not believe any chassis dyno would even be close to accurate at that level to begin with, even engine dyno's with a direct coupling to the engine have major issues with power at that level.. but anyway, the fastest lambo so far to the best of my knowledge is Heffner TT running in the 8's and still not break 170mph, but apparently some guy said the UG ones hit 170 in the 1/4.. either way those bikes can and HAVE trapped 200mph+ with 6 second passes on a street tire.

The math just doesnt add up in my head, not even close.. I love lambo's dont get me wrong, but with these claims you can officially call me a non-believer!!

snickerlicker
09-27-2012, 08:52 AM
I know these things are badass but I just dont buy into this magic car thing.. 1900whp are you serious? I would not believe any chassis dyno would even be close to accurate at that level to begin with, even engine dyno's with a direct coupling to the engine have major issues with power at that level.. but anyway, the fastest lambo so far to the best of my knowledge is Heffner TT running in the 8's and still not break 170mph, but apparently some guy said the UG ones hit 170 in the 1/4.. either way those bikes can and HAVE trapped 200mph+ with 6 second passes on a street tire.

The math just doesnt add up in my head, not even close.. I love lambo's dont get me wrong, but with these claims you can officially call me a non-believer!!

Now you really pissed off the roll racers who worship the Lambos. How dare you...LOL

K-ville
09-27-2012, 09:25 AM
Ive always thought the same thing scott! I usually chalk a bike loosing on a video like this to a bad rider but with it being a shamrock bike id assume he can ride... Its really weird i dont see it pulling 10cars on me like the first video... But no one round here has one so i guess ill never know.

slow ride
09-27-2012, 10:25 AM
On the street I could see traction and wanting to live coming into play for the rider:)

Scott
09-27-2012, 10:31 AM
This is all a lambo is good for right here..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-IQ8tMny64

and yes its probably worth it!

snickerlicker
09-27-2012, 01:09 PM
This is all a lambo is good for right here..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-IQ8tMny64

and yes its probably worth it!

I could watch that all day!

oVa-Boost
09-27-2012, 06:58 PM
damn figured she was gonna get naked

BGjohnson
09-27-2012, 08:24 PM
Pretty sure he got a nice Blow J at the end of the vid. At 1599hp, it's mandatory to get your junk sucked if a chick is in the passengers seat.

Domestic Disturbance
09-27-2012, 11:47 PM
The AWD part makes sense. I guess even the quickest ferraris are still RWD. But then why not the AWD porsche? Or an lfa, I think their redline is even higher. Its just silly to me that a few people have these original cars made, and everyone else just wants a copy. If I had money like that, why would I want what everyone else has? Don't get me wrong, I'm not tired of them yet, but the lack of some peoples originality is shocking.

... now I'm going back to looking at mustang and camaro parts....

Jappbox
09-28-2012, 06:00 AM
its the AWD and the V10 that make them great platforms. UGR does build the motors fully prob some trick work inside the blocks and im sure new sleeves, the trans gets some work as well and thier the R cars i know have built axles and all of the bells and whishles. but they do spend a good 200+k at UGR, not up my alley great sweet cars but way out of anyones price tag.

Scott
09-28-2012, 02:03 PM
okay I found this, I just have to assume its real and also add, holy shit..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZZvpXHcKSM&feature=plcp

Scott
09-28-2012, 02:09 PM
He could not of had a fun time slowing that car down from 180+ with no chute..

Jappbox
09-28-2012, 02:11 PM
Looks like they figured out how to make them launch, told you those fuckers were fast 181mph AWD on the street is going to be impossible to beat with a Bike. I want a ride in one fuck.

Scott
09-28-2012, 02:24 PM
yeah I dont know how strong the driveline is in those cars but it sure seems like there is more left in it in the 330

BGjohnson
09-28-2012, 09:54 PM
I'd gladly wear that bikini that chick had on for a ride!